Tuesday, 19 June 2012

Jonty, Bok Supporter




Mark sent me this photo of Jonty today by email. I think it was taken Saturday. We all got together to (1) watch SA beat England after they gave us a big scare in the first 20 minutes of the second half and (2) to log and bale a tree that toppled over in our back yard the previous week.

Manitoba Maple
Jonty, Claire, Ingrid










Jonty and Claire had a great time entertaining each other as usual. (Geoff in the background)
Caitlyn








Caitlyn spent a lot of time getting to know Aunty Judith.

Saturday, 2 June 2012

Post-surgery: Sobering but good news

On Thursday I had a follow-up appointment with the urologist who did
the surgery on my prostate to hear the pathologist's report. The
excellent news was that there was no evidence of cancer beyond the
prostate which had been removed; the margins and lymph nodes were all
clear. This means that I do not need any further treatment as a result
of the prostate cancer. In particular, I do not need any follow-up
radiation or chemo. I am so grateful.

The sobering news was that the nature of the cancer found in both
lobes of the prostate was of the more aggressive type that we thought,
from the biopsy, was only in one lobe, and that it had spread to the
outer "peel" of the prostate, getting ready, as it were, to leap into
metastasis. You could say that I had the surgery in the nick of time.

With 20/20 hindsight we now know that we made the right decision to
have a prostatectomy and to have it sooner rather than later. After
Ingrid and I left the doctor's rooms we went to celebrate together at a local
Indian restaurant that we love. He makes the most delicious Lamb
Korma.

Thank you to all my family and friends, and colleagues, for your
wonderful support. I have never felt alone throughout this experience.
I also have a lot of respect and appreciation for my urologist, Dr
Morrie Liquornik. I am aware of the privilege that is mine for living
in a First World country like Canada with such a good health-care
system.

Saturday, 26 May 2012

The Thing is gone - Good riddance to the catheter


If you hang one little boy for stealing a sheep then other little boys will not steal sheep.

Once you have committed murder it becomes quite easy to steal or tell a lie.

(I came across both of those quotes many decades ago.  The first, I thought, was quoted by Winston Churchill in his autobiographical book, "My Early Life" and was a threat uttered to the young Churchill by one of the older boys or even a master, but I cannot find the quote in an Internet search. I cannot remember the author of the second quote and, again, I cannot find the quote on-line.)

On Thursday of this week past, The Catheter,  the "Thing" with which I had become obsessed as front and centre of my life, my constant and inseparable and insufferable companion, was removed. A snip of the scissors to deflate the balloon in my bladder, a few tugs of pain - a little pressure the doctor described it as before each tug - and it was out, gone, consigned to a bin next to the bed. Night and day; chalk and cheese; just like that - tug, tug, tug, plop. What sweet, perfect bliss to pee in my pants instead of through a tube and into a bag that I had been carrying around, day and night, 24-7, for 15 days exactly. Other than when lying flat on my back I'd had an almost constant, somewhat painful, sensation of having a full bladder that urgently needed to be emptied. Walking and standing were difficult, but sitting was the worst. I was so  convinced that the darn thing must be at least partially blocked that I persuaded the home nurse, bless her, to irrigate (read back-wash) the catheter on one of her visits - to no avail. "At least we know that is not the problem," she said, putting a positive spin on it.

My heart goes out to all those poor souls for whom this is a life sentence - people in hospices and elderly patients who have no hope that this thing will ever be removed, never ever.

So, now I pee my pants. Without the catheter experience to soften me up beforehand that might have been quite traumatic bearing in mind the carrot-stick socialising process to enforce conformity (the ostracism after peeing your pants as a child was like a public hanging) but now It's quite easy, really; as easy as lying or stealing after committing murder - the more so thanks to my Depends MEN GUARDS! I can do it and nobody knows my dirty secret as I walk down the street or stand up in church to sing the hymn.

This takes me back to my Grade 2 year in school. We called it Class 2 in Natal back then. The boys' toilets were being repaired so we all had to use the girls' toilets. One little boy asked to "be excused." He was allowed to go to the toilet. I thought it would be a good idea to see the girls toilets so I also asked if I could be excused. The teacher said, "You don't really need to go. You just want to see the girls toilets." Well, now. I was crushed and felt put down. How did she know whether I really needed to go or not? True, I did not need to go, but I could go, and I would show her that she was wrong. I peed my pants at my desk in the front row of the classroom. I still remember the warmth and the wet and the smell and the thrill and then the embarrassment when the little girl at the next desk told the teacher that I had wet my pants and it was all over the floor under my desk and was still dripping down. Well, she couldn't say anymore that I had not needed to go, could she. I still relish the look of exasperation on her face. I never really got into trouble for that. She wrote a letter informing my parents what had happened. They scolded my mildly but I think they all gave me the benefit of the doubt.

Saturday, 19 May 2012

Faith and Atheism

One of my FaceBook friends posted the following on his wall:

"Faith is the surrender of the mind; it's the surrender of reason, it's the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other mammals. It's our need to believe, and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something that is the sinister thing to me. Of all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated." - Christopher Hitchens
According to Wikiquotes this is taken from "Holier Than Thou", Penn & Teller: Bullshit!, 23 May 2005.

Before going any further let me clarify that none of my friends agrees with me on everything. Even my wife and I have some areas where we disagree but still remain the greatest of friends. Things only get tense when you don't like me or my friends based on some form of group prejudice (race, religion, sexual orientation.) And now, back to Hitchens...

I will concede that his first sentence above is a definition of faith even in the minds of some "believers". Clearly, this is the definition of faith in the minds of Atheists as this quote is held up as a quotable quote among Atheists. However, that definition is by no means universal among "believers."

While my definition of faith includes believing that which cannot be empirically demonstrated, it precludes the surrender of the mind and the surrender of reason. On the contrary, it is precisely the use of the mind and reason that enables humans to have faith and the other mammals not. Faith is a peculiarly human quality not to be found among any other species on the planet.

Deductive reasoning
Astronomers, astro-physicists and other scientists tell us that the universe is finite in space and time; that its size and age can be approximately calculated. They tell us that "before" the universe was born there was "nothing"; not even empty space. Nothing.

I am not a scientist but my mind reasons that something cannot create itself out of nothing before it exists. It is not a surrender of reason but an exercise thereof to conclude that some "thing" beyond the confines of the time and space of this universe was responsible for the coming into existence of this universe. That "Something" I choose to call the Creator.
I deal with this topic a bit more fully in my blog of 19 Dec 2010 "I am sceptical of skeptical atheism"
http://terryin-sites.blogspot.com/2010/12/i-am-sceptical-about-skeptical-atheism.html
...and its follow up on 24 Jan 2011.

In my opinion, in the face of the evidence of the finite nature of our universe, it requires a greater and more irrational faith to say, we cannot prove a creator's existence empirically therefore a creator does not exist.

Sent from my BlackBerry

Friday, 18 May 2012

The True Cost of Things - and Who Pays?

After question period in the House of Commons yesterday Leader of the Opposition, Thomas Mulcair, is reported as saying that the government is allowing the oilsands to develop, "without applying basic rules of sustainable development, without applying the one rule of sustainable development, which is polluter pays."

"If you don't include those costs, we're doing the same thing as if we had a factory where we were pushing the garbage into a river in the back. It's not the real profit, it's not the real price."

CBC News: Is Canada suffering from 'Dutch disease'?

Unfortunately this truth is being obscured by the debate about whether and to what extent exports of crude oil from the oil sands are driving up the Canadian dollar to the detriment of Manufacturing - so-called Dutch Disease; the implication seeming to be, if it's not causing Dutch Disease to a significant degree then it's OK to dump our garbage in the river for someone else to clean up.

This is not peculiar to the Alberta oilsands, nor to Canada. It is vital to include this "garbage in the river" principle in any debate about the economic merits and demerits of different methods of energy generation and storage, particularly when people laud the "low cost" of carbon emitting power generation and how squeaky clean nuclear power is. Regarding the latter, we do not yet know how to "finally" store nuclear waste, let alone the cost.

We'll simply let my grandchildren and their generation worry about that - and pay for it!
Sent from my BlackBerry